Classroom discourse analysis in didactical design of linear equations in one variable: The development of students' critical thinking skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v8i2.3275Keywords:
classroom discourse, critical thinking skills, didactical design, desain didaktis, persamaan linear satu variabel, kemampuan berpikir kritis, desain didaktis, persamaan linear satu variabel, kemampuan berpikir kritisAbstract
This study aims to analyze classroom discourse within the didactical design of linear equations in one variable, focusing on the development of students’ critical thinking skills. The research employed a qualitative approach with an evaluative design. The main participants consisted of one mathematics teacher and 12 seventh-grade students (class VII-1) from a public junior high school in Bandar Lampung during the first semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The students were grouped according to their mathematical abilities into high, medium, low, and mixed categories. Based on secondary data, the majority of the class consisted of students with low academic ability. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, while validity was ensured using triangulation techniques. Data analysis was conducted in three stages: data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. The findings indicate that (1) the most dominant form of classroom discourse produced by students was questions and answers, highlighting the importance of designing learning activities that facilitate complex questioning and answering to support the development of students’ critical thinking skills; (2) the most frequently observed indicator of critical thinking in classroom discourse was evaluation; and (3) students with medium-level mathematical ability were the most dominant in generating classroom discourse, which was influenced by factors of comfort.
Downloads
References
Andiani, L., Solihat, Y. N., Lestari, T. D., Bandawati, S., & Halimatussa’diyah. (2024). Strategi guru melalui pendekatan sosiologi dalam penanaman karakter peserta didik. Literasi: Journal of Innovation Literacy Studies, 1(1), 40–51.
Arisoy, B., & Aybek, B. (2021). The effects of subject-based critical thinking education in mathematics on students’ critical thinking skills and virtues. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 92, 99–120. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6
Ayuwanti, I., Marsigit, & Siswoyo, D. (2021). Teacher-student interaction in mathematics learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(2), 660–667. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21184
Azmidar, A., Darhim, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). Enhancing students’ interest through mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012072
Bradford, S. M. (2007). The use of mathematics dialogues to support student learning in high school prealgebra classes [Doctoral dissertation, University of Montana]. ScholarWorks. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1098
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques (N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Eds.; Vol. 19). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
Çelik Demirci, S., & Baki, A. (2023). Characterizing mathematical discourse according to teacher and student interactions: The core of mathematical discourse. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(4), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202321852
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Desmayanasari, D., & Hardianti, D. (2021). Desain didaktis sifat-sifat bangun datar segiempat. Jurnal Gammath, 6(1), 18–31.
Facione, P. A. (2023). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://insightassessment.com/iaresource/critical-thinking-what-it-is-and-why-it-counts/
Fanggi, I. S., Samo, D. D., & Udil, P. A. (2023). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Rote Barat Daya pada materi eksponen ditinjau dari tingkat kemampuan siswa dan alternatif solusi dengan konflik kognitif. Haumeni Journal of Education, 3(2), 73–82.
Gonzalez, J. M. (2008). Encyclopedia of bilingual education. Sage. http://tarbiyati.iki.ac.ir/files/tarbiyati.iki.ac.ir/Encyclopedia%20of%20Bilingual%20Education.pdf
Gustafsson, P. (2024). Exploring and developing a framework for analysing whole-class discussions in mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2023.2292263
Hamzah, N., Maat, S. M., & Ikhsan, Z. (2021). A systematic review on pupils’ misconceptions and errors in trigonometry. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.20
Hardman, J., & Hardman, F. (2017). Guided co-construction of classroom talk. In D. Wyse, L. H. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Discourse and education (pp. 199–210). Springer.
Hasibuan, R. Y., Batubara, F. A., Nasution, A. N., Sundari, S., Ineztasyah, L. A., Lumbantobing, S. U., Furqon, H. B., & Haris, D. (2024). Permodelan jaringan sosial dalam pembelajaran matematika kolaboratif di SMA Swasta Utama Medan. Jurnal Multidisiplin Inovatif, 8(11), 17–23.
Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Juandi, D., Dahlan, J. A., Hidayat, R., Wardat, Y., Sahara, S., & Muhaimin, L. H. (2024). The didactic phenomenon: Deciphering students’ learning obstacles in set theory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp517-544
Herna, H. (2018). Analisis wacana terkait percakapan konsep matematika. Pepatudzu: Media Pendidikan dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 14(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.35329/fkip.v14i1.145
Kooloos, C., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., van Boven, S., Kaenders, R., & Heckman, G. (2022). Building on student mathematical thinking in whole-class discourse: Exploring teachers’ in-the-moment decision-making, interpretation, and underlying conceptions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(4), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09499-z
Lieung, K. (2019). Pengaruh model discovery learning terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Musamus Journal of Primary Education, 1(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.35724/musjpe.v1i2.1465
Lloyd, M. H., Kolodziej, N. J., & Brashears, K. M. (2016). Classroom discourse: An essential component in building a classroom community. School Community Journal, 26(2), 291–304.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Academic literacy in mathematics for English learners. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.005
Nanga, B., Ngadha, C., Ledu, M. G. G., Dhiu, M. I., & Lawe, Y. U. (2023). Penerapan metode diskusi untuk mengaktifkan proses berpikir kritis siswa kelas 3 SD dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Citra Pendidikan Anak, 2(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.38048/jcpa.v2i1.1532
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Pahrudin, A., Zahra, Y. F., Supriadi, N., Sugiharta, I., Farida, F., & Suherman, S. (2021). Assessing Moodle-assisted e-learning for students’ concept understanding and critical thinking skills in algebra. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v12i2.9776
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf
Puling, H., Manilang, E., & Lawalata, M. (2024). Logika dan berpikir kritis: Hubungan dan dampak dalam pengambilan keputusan. Sinar Kasih: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama dan Filsafat, 2(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.55606/sinarkasih.v2i2.319
Rahmawati, R., Sumarni, S., & Adiastuty, N. (2023). Analisis desain didaktis materi bangun ruang sisi datar dengan pendekatan konstruktivisme dan model discovery learning. PRISMA, 12(1), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v12i1.2711
Ria, A. M., Lusiana, L., & Fuadiah, N. F. (2023). Desain didaktis materi limit fungsi aljabar pada pembelajaran matematika SMA. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2189
Salsabila, R., Herdiana, H. R., & Hidayatullah, A. (2023). Tindak tutur direktif pada interaksi guru dan siswa dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia di kelas XI IPS 2 SMA Islam Cipasung Singaparna (pengembangan bahan ajar dalam pembelajaran drama). Jurnal Diksatrasia, 7(2), 496–517.
Sari, E. R., Yusnan, M., & Matje, I. (2022). Peran guru dalam meningkatkan keaktifan belajar siswa melalui media pembelajaran. Jurnal Eduscience, 9(2), 583–591.
Sari, M. N., Ningsih, P. E. A., & Novita, A. (2023). An analysis of English classroom interaction pattern at eleventh grade of SMKN 4 Kerinci based on El Hanafi theory. Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli, 6(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v6i1.1452
Sebayang, H. J., Husein, R., & Harahap, N. A. S. (2024). A classroom discourse analysis of teacher-students’ interaction at SMP Negeri 7 Medan. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 1(3), 14538–14542.
Sholikhah, P. M., & Syah, N. I. (2024). Penerapan metode diskusi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(3), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.69714/y403yx51
Stivers, T. (2022). The book of answers: Alignment, autonomy, and affiliation in social interaction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197563892.001.0001
Suhenda, L. L. A., & Munandar, D. R. (2023). Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2), 1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.5049
Suherdi, D. (2010). Introduction to systemiotic approach to classroom discourse analysis. In M. Mukhlis F. A. (Ed.), Classroom discourse analysis “A systemiotic approach†(Rev. ed., pp. 1–35). CELTICS Press.
Tsany, H. A., Nurbayan, Y., & Nurmala, M. (2024). Analisis pola interaksi wacana kelas dalam pembelajaran bahasa Arab di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 4(2), 556–571. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v4i2.549
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wagner, D. (2004). Critical awareness of voice in mathematics classroom discourse: Learning the steps in the “dance of agency.†In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 409–416). PME.
Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320292
Wang, X. (2015). Reflection on mathematics classroom discourse: The perspective of critical pedagogy. Education and Linguistics Research, 1(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v1i2.7900
Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Krismayani, N. W., Martini, N. M. W., Mantra, I. B. N., & Sukoco, H. (2022). Communication, inquiring, networking, teaching, applying (CINTA) as an effective learning model to improve students’ critical and creative thinking skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(12), 1337–1344. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1757
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jihan Tama Farasiska, Tina Yunarti, Niki Pujarwati, Santy Setiawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
