Exploring the effectiveness of scratch assisted problem-based learning on students' conceptual understanding : A quasi-experimental study

Authors

  • Devi Syafitri Padang Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Eyus Sudihartinih Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v9i2.4768

Keywords:

scratch, problem-based learning, mathematical conceptual understanding, systems of linear equations, quasi-experimental study, PBL, kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of using Scratch-based Problem-Based Learning on junior high school students’ understanding of mathematical concepts in the topic of Systems of Linear Equations with Two Variables. This study employs a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design. The research sample consisted of 62 eighth-grade junior high school students, comprising 32 students in the experimental group and 30 students in the control group. The experimental group received instruction using the Scratch-based PBL approach, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were collected through pre- and post-instruction tests of mathematical conceptual understanding and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, Levene’s test of homogeneity, the paired samples t-test, the independent samples t-test, Normalized Gain (N-Gain) analysis, and Cohen’s d effect size. The results of the study indicate that the use of Scratch-based Problem-Based Learning media led to a significantly higher improvement in mathematical conceptual understanding compared to conventional instruction. The experimental group achieved an average N-Gain of 0.589, which was higher than that of the control group, which achieved an average N-Gain of 0.352, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the analysis results showed an effect size (Cohen’s d) of 1.076, which falls into the “large” category, indicating that the implementation of Scratch-based Problem-Based Learning has a strong practical impact on improving students’ mathematical conceptual understanding. The novelty of this study lies in the integration of Scratch as a visual programming environment into every stage of Problem-Based Learning to facilitate the visualization, exploration, and reflection of mathematical concepts, thereby strengthening students’ knowledge construction process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addido, J., Borowczak, A. C. B., & Slater, T. F. (2025). Impact of conceptual understanding, teaching experience, and parental education on science achievement: TIMSS data analysis. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/17622

Adeniji, S. M., & Baker, P. (2022). Worked-examples instruction versus Van Hiele teaching phases: A demonstration of students’ procedural and conceptual understanding. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp337-356

Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Student activities in solving mathematics problems with computational thinking using Scratch. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23308

Amri, R. A., Gunowibowo, P., & Wijaya, A. P. (2025). The effect of the guided discovery learning model on students’ mathematical reasoning ability. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 8(2), 321–329. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v8i2.3249

Ayeh, I. G. (2025). Students’ mathematics conceptual challenges: Exploring students’ thinking, understanding, and misconceptions in functions and graphs. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/16596

Belessova, D., Ibashova, A., Zhidebayeva, A., Shaimerdenova, G., & Nakhipova, V. (2024). The impact of Scratch on student engagement and academic performance in primary schools. Open Education Studies, 6(1), Article 20220228. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0228

Belue, P. T., Cavey, L. O., & Kinzel, M. T. (2017). An exploration of a quantitative reasoning instructional approach to linear equations in two variables with community college students. School Science and Mathematics, 117(5), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12223

Cai, J., Ding, M., & Hwang, S. (2026). Fostering students’ mathematical understanding: Toward a theoretical framework. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 5(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263261442721

Calder, N. (2018). Using Scratch to facilitate mathematical thinking. Waikato Journal of Education, 23(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v23i2.654

Calder, N., & Taylor, M. (2010). Scratching below the surface: Mathematics through an alternative digital lens? In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 117–124). MERGA. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520871.pdf

Edo, S. I., & Tasik, W. F. (2022). Investigation of students’ algebraic conceptual understanding and the ability to solve PISA-like mathematics problems in a modeling task. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(2), 44–60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1350638

Fatio, N. A., Fatimah, S., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2020). The analysis of students’ learning difficulties on system of linear equation in two variables topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032062. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032062

Fitrah, M., Sofroniou, A., Setiawan, C., Widihastuti, W., Yarmanetti, N., Jaya, M. P. S., Panuntun, J. G., Arfaton, A., Beteno, S., & Susianti, I. (2025). The impact of integrated project-based learning and flipped classroom on students’ computational thinking skills: Embedded mixed methods. Education Sciences, 15(4), 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040448

Funa, A. A., & Prudente, M. S. (2021). Effectiveness of problem-based learning on secondary students’ achievement in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1445a

Hadianto, D., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2021). Does reading comprehension competence determine the level of competence in solving mathematical word problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012049

Iskandar, R. S. F., Darhim, Dahlan, J. A., Jupri, A., & Supriyadi, E. (2024). How to analyze objects in the context of realistic mathematics education using Scratch programming? Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 19(5), 10–17. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special%20Issue%20ISCoE%202023_3/ISCoE%202023%203_02.pdf

Lukman, H. S., & Setiani, A. (2019). Teaching materials design based on project learning to improve students’ mathematical understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012026

Mangiri, G. R. P., & Prabawanto, S. (2024). Exploring computational thinking in learning mathematics: A systematic literature review from 2017–2024. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp34-52

Maqhfiroh, H., & Maharani, H. R. (2025). Effectiveness of Scratch-based interactive learning media on students’ mathematical problem-solving. Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 13(3), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v13i3.19673

Mediana, N., Funa, A., & Dio, R. (2025). Effectiveness of inquiry-based learning on improving students’ conceptual understanding in science and mathematics: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(2), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4769

Meiliati, R., Djodding, I. M., Aswin, Salido, A., Husain, D. S., Tahir, & Hidayati, U. (2026). Exploration problem-based learning in mathematics learning in higher education: A bibliometric review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102345

Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in K–8 mathematics and science education: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674

Musna, R. R., Juandi, D., & Jupri, A. (2021). A meta-analysis study of the effect of the problem-based learning model on students’ mathematical problem-solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012090. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012090

Mustafa, V., Jusufi Zenku, T., Iseni, E., & Rexhepi, S. (2026). Comparison of solving systems of linear equations with two variables using classical methods and application software. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 21(1), em0867. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/17836

Muzana, S. R., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., Yanto, B. E., & Mustamin, A. A. (2021). E-STEM project-based learning in teaching science to increase ICT literacy and problem solving. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1386–1394. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.21942

Nurhasanah, A., Handoyo, E., Widiyatmoko, A., & Rusdarti, R. (2025). Digital-based learning media innovation: Improving motivation and science learning outcomes. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 7(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.723

Payadnya, I. P. A. A., Suwija, I. K., & Wibawa, K. A. (2021). Analysis of students’ abilities in solving realistic mathematics problems using “what-if” ethnomathematics instruments. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 13(4), 131–149. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1332339

Pérez-Jorge, D., & Martínez-Murciano, M. C. (2022). Gamification with Scratch or App Inventor in higher education: A systematic review. Future Internet, 14(12), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14120374

Prayitno, B. A., Widoretno, S., Sugiharto, B., & Oetomo, D. (2026). Can scientific-based learning close the gap in understanding science concepts between underachiever and high-achiever students? Journal of Teaching and Learning, 20(1), 280–296. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i2.8763

Purwanto, W. R., Zaenuri, Z., Wardono, W., & Junaedi, I. (2022). A meta-analysis on the effect of ethnomathematics on students’ ability in geometry. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, 8(1), 114–122. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/ISET/article/view/1737

Purwoko, R. Y., Supriyono, Nuryadi, Kusumaningrum, B., & Setiana, D. S. (2023). Developing an e-module based on ethnomathematics to improve students’ creative thinking ability. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Education (ICITE 2023) (pp. 44–48). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-338-2_7

Putra, B. Y. G., Yaniawati, P., Fitri, N., Sharif, S., Supianti, I. I., & Mudrikah, A. (2025). Analyzing student errors in PISA “Change and Relationship” tasks using the AVAEM framework. Infinity Journal, 14(4), 1105–1128. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i4.p1105-1128

Rahman, T., & Nisa, F. (2020). Pengaruh model Problem Based Learning dengan strategi Everyone Is a Teacher Here terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan self-confidence siswa SMP. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 2(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v2i2.336

Rahmawati, L., Zaenuri, & Hidayah, I. (2023). Pembelajaran bernuansa etnomatematika sebagai upaya menumbuhkan karakter cinta budaya dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v5i1.5984

Rahmawati, N. D., Wardono, W., Wijayanti, K., & Dewi, N. R. (2026). Mathematical literacy with technology-assisted scaffolding in Indonesia: Camper and quitter students in solving PISA problems. Educational Process: International Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2026.20.10

Raudiyah, R. R., & Suryadi, D. (2023). Junior high school students’ learning obstacles related to mathematical communication ability on systems of linear equations in two variables. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2734, 090011. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156250

Saad, A., & Zainudin, S. (2022). A review of project-based learning and computational thinking in teaching and learning. Learning and Motivation, 78, 101802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101802

Sacristán, A. I., Faggiano, E., Santacruz-Rodríguez, M., & Rocha, H. (2024). Policies and implementations for technology integration in mathematics education: Perspectives from around the world. In B. Pepin, G. Gueudet, & J. Choppin (Eds.), Handbook of digital resources in mathematics education (pp. 1263–1305). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45667-1_52

Sercenia, J. C., Ibañez, E. D., & Pentang, J. T. (2023). Thinking beyond thinking: Junior high school students’ metacognitive awareness and conceptual understanding of integers. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(1), 4–24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1391473.pdf

Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.12.2.0088

Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728

Sugawara, M., Sekao, D., & Sibiya, M. R. (2026). Investigating learners’ misconceptions on division of whole numbers to identify a goal of research lesson: A case of lesson study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 21(1), em0863. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/17700

Sukkamart, A., Chachiyo, W., Chachiyo, M., Pimdee, P., Moto, S., & Tansiri, P. (2025). Enhancing computational thinking skills in Thai middle school students through problem-based blended learning approaches. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2445951. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2445951

Sulaiman, T., Abdul Rahim, S. S., Wong, K., & Wan Jaafar, W. M. (2021). The use of “Scratch and Challenge Board” as an alternative assessment tool to enhance university students’ skills. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14506

Sungur, S., & Ozkan, G. (2026). Coding science: The role of block-based programming activities in enhancing computational thinking and science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10317-5

Wen, F.-H., Wu, T., & Hsu, W.-C. (2023). Toward improving student motivation and performance in introductory programming learning using Scratch: The role of achievement emotions. Science Progress, 106(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504231205985

Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728

Zhang, W., Guan, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024). The efficacy of project-based learning in enhancing computational thinking among students: A meta-analysis of 31 experiments and quasi-experiments. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14513–14545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Padang, D. S., & Eyus Sudihartinih. (2026). Exploring the effectiveness of scratch assisted problem-based learning on students’ conceptual understanding : A quasi-experimental study. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 9(2), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v9i2.4768

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.