Moodle-integrated flipped classroom design to enhance students' mathematical conceptual understanding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v9i1.4089Keywords:
Flipped classroom, learning analytics, mathematical conceptual understanding, Moodle, Student Engagement, keterlibatan siswa, kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematisAbstract
Mathematical conceptual understanding is an essential ability that enables students to interpret, connect, represent, and apply mathematical ideas. However, students still experience difficulties in developing this ability, partly due to procedural and teacher-centered learning practices. This study aimed to design and develop a Moodle-integrated Flipped Classroom and evaluate its validity, practicality, and effectiveness in enhancing students’ mathematical conceptual understanding on geometric transformation material. This study employed a Research and Development approach using the Plomp model, consisting of preliminary research, prototyping, and assessment phases. The participants were 32 eighth-grade students at one state junior high school in Medan, North Sumatra. Data were collected through expert validation sheets, teacher and student practicality questionnaires, Moodle log activity data, and pre-test and post-test instruments. The results showed that the Moodle-integrated Flipped Classroom was very valid with a score of 90.6%, very practical with a score of 86.3%, and effective based on the predetermined effectiveness criterion, as indicated by a moderate N-Gain score of 0.51. Learning analytics data showed high student engagement, including a 90.6% video completion rate, an 89.6% quiz completion rate, and 288 forum interactions with a 1.8:1 reply-to-post ratio. The highest improvements occurred in connecting mathematical concepts and applying concepts in new situations. These findings indicate that a systematically designed Moodle-integrated Flipped Classroom can support students’ mathematical conceptual understanding through structured independent learning, interactive activities, and collaborative discussion.
Downloads
References
Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Aldiab, A., Chowdhury, H., Kootsookos, A., Alam, F., & Allhibi, H. (2019). Utilization of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education system: A case review for Saudi Arabia. Energy Procedia, 160, 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.186
Algayres, M. G., & Triantafyllou, E. (2020). Learning analytics in flipped classrooms: A scoping review. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(5), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.5.003
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings (pp. 23.1200.1–23.1200.18). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students' learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
Doo, M. Y., & Park, Y. (2024). Pre-class learning analytics in flipped classroom: Focusing on resource management strategy, procrastination and repetitive learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1231–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12946
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022). A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x
Giannakos, M. N., Chorianopoulos, K., & Chrisochoides, N. (2015). Making sense of video analytics: Lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1976
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Haya, P., Siregar, S. N., & Roza, Y. (2025). Implementing problem-based learning to improve students' learning outcomes: A classroom action research. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 8(2), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v8i2.3101
Kandaga, T., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2022). Epistemological obstacle in transformation geometry based on van Hiele's level. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), Article em2096. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11914
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2023.
Li, S., Fu, W., Liu, X., & Hwang, G.-J. (2025). Effectiveness of flipped classrooms for K–12 students: Evidence from a three-level meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 95(5), 929–971. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241261732
Medina Herrera, L. M., Juárez Ordóñez, S., & Ruiz-Loza, S. (2024). Enhancing mathematical education with spatial visualization tools. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1229126. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1229126
Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E., & Husein, R. (2016). Mathematical understanding and representation ability of public junior high school in North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2816.43-56
Mursyidah, H., Hermoyo, R. P., & Suwaibah, D. (2021). Does flipped learning method via Moodle can improve outcomes and motivation of discrete mathematics learning during COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1720(1), Article 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1720/1/012007
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (Eds.). (2013). Educational design research: Part A: An introduction. SLO.
Purnomo, B., Muhtadi, A., Ramadhani, R., Manaf, A., & Hukom, J. (2022). The effect of flipped classroom model on mathematical ability: A meta-analysis study. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(3), 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v12.i3.202216
Rahmania, M. D., Fatah, A., & Anriani, N. (2023). Pengembangan media pembelajaran interaktif matematika berbasis web Articulate Storyline untuk meningkatkan minat belajar siswa SMP. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 5(2), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v5i2.1777
Raspopovic, M., Cvetanovic, S., Medan, I., & Ljubojevic, D. (2017). The effects of integrating social learning environment with online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2645
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. Cohen Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.014
Saygili, H., & Çetin, H. (2021). The effects of Learning Management Systems (LMS) on mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis study. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 15(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1026534
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Setiawan, S., Julrissani, J., & Savira, L. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa pada materi bangun ruang sisi datar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.5106
Trisandi, Y. P., Kartini, K., & Saragih, S. (2024). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis discovery learning untuk memfasilitasi kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa SMP pada materi himpunan. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 6(2), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v6i2.2321
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wei, X., Cheng, I.-L., Chen, N.-S., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhai, X., & Kinshuk. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x
Yorganci, S. (2025). The impact of synchronous online discussions and online flipped learning on student engagement and self-regulation among preliminary undergraduates in a basic math course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(3), 1569–1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10459-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fitry Wahyuni, Izwita Dewi, Faiz Ahyaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
