How do prospective mathematics teachers approach proof and refutation? A focus on abductive reasoning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v9i1.3882Keywords:
abductive reasoning, proof, refutation, penalaran abduktif, pembuktian, penyangkalanAbstract
This study aims to explore the abductive reasoning strategies used by prospective mathematics teachers in proving and refuting mathematical statements. This study used a qualitative method with a case study design. Fourteen third-year prospective mathematics teachers were involved in this study and were then grouped according to the characteristics of the type of abductive reasoning they used. Data collection techniques included tests given to all prospective mathematics teachers and interviews conducted with five prospective mathematics teachers selected based on their type of abductive reasoning. The data obtained was analyzed through stages that included data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. Technique triangulation was used to check the validity of the research findings. In general, it was found that the types of abductive reasoning strategies used by prospective mathematics teachers in proving included fact optimization and mistaken fact. Meanwhile, in refuting mathematical statements, there are three types of abductive reasoning used by students, consisting of fact optimization, mistaken fact, and factual error. The results of this study provide insight into how abductive reasoning contributes to formulating mathematical conjectures and can help educators design relevant learning strategies to support the improvement of students' proof and refutation abilities
Downloads
References
Abakah, F., & Brijlall, D. (2024). Misconceptions of mathematical concepts vis-à-vis how they pose as barriers to developing students’ conceptual understanding. Gulf Journal of Mathematics, 16(2), 81–99.
https://doi.org/10.56947/gjom.v16i2.1871
Aisyah, N., Susanti, E., Meryansumayeka, M., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Proving geometry theorems: Student prospective teachers’ perseverance and mathematical reasoning. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p377-392
Alcock, L., & Attridge, N. (2023). Refutations and reasoning in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-023-00220-4
Antonini, S. (2019). Intuitive acceptance of proof by contradiction. ZDM, 51(5), 793–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01066-4
Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2019). Dragging, instrumented abduction and evidence, in processes of conjecture generation in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM, 51(5), 779–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01046-8
Badjeber, R., Sukayasa, I. W., Hadi, W., & Melissa, M. M. (2025). Learning obstacle of prospective mathematics teachers on real analysis. Koordinat: Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika dan Sains, 6(1), 13–24.
https://doi.org/10.24239/koordinat.v6i1.147
Bellucci, F. (2018). Eco and Peirce on abduction. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, X(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1122
Bergwall, A. (2021). Proof-related reasoning in upper secondary school: Characteristics of Swedish and Finnish textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(5), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1704085
Budiarto, M. T., & Artiono, R. (2019). Geometri dan permasalahan dalam pembelajarannya: Suatu penelitian meta analisis. JUMADIKA: Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 9–18.
https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol1iss1year2019page9-18
Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., & Cabañas Sánchez, M. G. (2022). Argumentación matemática basada en refutaciones. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 11(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.4015
Chand, H. B. (2021). Difficulties experienced by undergraduate students in proving theorems of real analysis. Scholars’ Journal, 4(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.3126/scholars.v4i1.42475
Cramer-Petersen, C. L., Christensen, B. T., & Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2019). Empirically analysing design reasoning patterns: Abductive-deductive reasoning patterns dominate design idea generation. Design Studies, 60, 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.001
Creager, M. A. (2022). Geometric refutations of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1594
Dogan, M. F., & Williams-Pierce, C. (2021). The role of generic examples in teachers’ proving activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10002-3
Elfiah, N. S., Maharani, H. R., & Aminudin, M. (2020). Hambatan epistemologi siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah bangun ruang sisi datar. Delta: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.31941/delta.v8i1.887
Faisal, T. A., Hasanah, R. U., & Fatmawati, R. (2024). Systematic literature review (SLR): Analisis problematika mahasiswa pendidikan matematika pada mata kuliah analisis real. Student Scientific Creativity Journal, 2(3), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.55606/sscj-amik.v2i3.3129
Ferguson, J. P. (2019). Students are not inferential-misfits: Naturalising logic in the science classroom. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(8), 852–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1516141
Firdausy, A. R., Triyanto, & Indriati, D. (2021). Mathematical reasoning abilities of high school students in solving contextual problems. International Journal of Science and Society, 3(1), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v3i1.285
Fu, Y., Qi, C., & Wang, J. (2022). Reasoning and proof in algebra: The case of three reform-oriented textbooks in China. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(1), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00199-1
Gabriel, F., Buckley, S., & Barthakur, A. (2020). The impact of mathematics anxiety on self-regulated learning and mathematical literacy. Australian Journal of Education, 64(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944120947881
Güler, G. (2016). The difficulties experienced in teaching proof to prospective mathematics teachers: Academician views. Higher Education Studies, 6(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v6n1p145
Hamami, Y., & Morris, R. L. (2020). Philosophy of mathematical practice: A primer for mathematics educators. ZDM, 52(6), 1113–1126.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01159-5
Hein, K., & Prediger, S. (2024). Scaffolds for seeing, using, and articulating logical structures in proofs: Design research study with high school students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 74, Article 101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101123
Hidayah, I. N., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Sudirman, S. (2020). Characteristics of students’ abductive reasoning in solving algebra problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11869.347-362
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2018). “... And therefore in a remote sense abduction rests upon diagrammatic reasoning.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92553
Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8
Kandaga, T., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2022). Epistemological obstacle in transformation geometry based on van Hiele’s level. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), Article em2096. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11914
Kaplan, H. A., Gulkilik, H., & Emul, N. (2021). Role of formal constraints in reasoning: An approach through 2D Euclidean geometry in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(6), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1738578
Ko, Y.-Y., & Knuth, E. J. (2013). Validating proofs and counterexamples across content domains: Practices of importance for mathematics majors. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.09.003
Komatsu, K. (2016). A framework for proofs and refutations in school mathematics: Increasing content by deductive guessing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9677-0
Komatsu, K. (2017). Fostering empirical examination after proof construction in secondary school geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9731-6
Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2022). Generating mathematical knowledge in the classroom through proof, refutation, and abductive reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(3), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10086-5
Komatsu, K., Jones, K., Ikeda, T., & Narazaki, A. (2017). Proof validation and modification in secondary school geometry. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 47, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.05.002
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis (4th ed.). SAGE.
Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., Iwata, K., & Jones, K. (2024). Level-spanning proof-production strategies to enhance students’ understanding of the proof structure in school mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(7), 1597–1618.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2075288
Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2017). Students’ understanding of the structure of deductive proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9720-9
Nadlifah, M., & Prabawanto, S. (2017). Mathematical proof construction: Students’ ability in higher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, Article 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012094
Ndemo, Z. (2019). Flaws in proof constructions of postgraduate mathematics education student teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7864.379-396
Nurafni, N., Miatun, A., Khusna, H., & Jusra, H. (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar materi induksi matematika dan teori binomial berbasis pembuktian. KALAMATIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol4no1.2019pp89-108
O’Reilly, C. J. (2016). Creative engineers: Is abductive reasoning encouraged enough in degree project work? Procedia CIRP, 50, 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.155
Park, J., & Lee, K.-H. (2016). How can students generalize the chain rule? The roles of abduction in mathematical modeling. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1289a
Pedemonte, B. (2018). Strategic vs. definitory rules: Their role in abductive argumentation and their relationship with deductive proof. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(9).
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92562
Pedemonte, B., & Reid, D. (2011). The role of abduction in proving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9275-0
Pinto, A., & Cooper, J. (2022, October). Refutation feedback on student proofs beyond counter-examples. Fourth Conference of the International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics, Hannover, Germany. HAL. https://hal.science/hal-04026703
Putra, Z. H., Afrillia, Y. M., Dahnilsyah, & Tjoe, H. (2023). Prospective elementary teachers’ informal mathematical proof using GeoGebra: The case of 3D shapes. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 449–468.
https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp449-468
Ramandani, M. R., Hartono, Y., Hiltrimartin, C., & Aisyah, N. (2024). Investigating lower secondary school students’ geometric argumentation structure using Toulmin model. Jurnal Elemen, 10(2), 260–273.
https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i2.24116
Reid, D. A. (2018). Abductive reasoning in mathematics education: Approaches to and theorisations of a complex idea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92552
Roh, K. H., & Lee, Y. H. (2017). Designing tasks of introductory real analysis to bridge a gap between students’ intuition and mathematical rigor: The case of the convergence of a sequence. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 34–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0039-9
Salsabila, E., Rahayu, W., & Sampoerno, P. D. (2021). Influence of learning strategy and authentic assessment toward students’ mathematical proving ability by controlling prerequisite concepts understanding. AIP Conference Proceedings, Article 020007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041723
Sari, Y. M., Retnawati, H., & Fiangga, S. (2022). The construct validity of mathematical reasoning and proof test instrument integrated with GeoGebra: Second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 15(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v15i2.549
Shodikin, A. (2017). Effect of learning with abductive-deductive strategy towards the achievement of reasoning ability of high school students. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p111-120
Shodikin, A., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., & Sudirman, S. (2021). Students’ thinking process when using abductive reasoning in problem solving. Acta Scientiae, 23(2), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6026
Siswono, T. Y. E., Hartono, S., & Kohar, A. W. (2020). Deductive or inductive? Prospective teachers’ preference of proof method on an intermediate proof task. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11846.417-438
Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034869
Wasserman, N., Weber, K., Villanueva, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ views about the limited utility of real analysis: A transport model hypothesis. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.01.004
Widadah, S., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Ekawati, R. (2024). Constructing mathematical proofs through abductive reasoning. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education. https://doi.org/10.26220/REV.5025
Wu, A. D., Stone, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2016). Developing a validity argument through abductive reasoning with an empirical demonstration of the latent class analysis. International Journal of Testing, 16(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2015.1057826
Zengin, Y. (2017). The effects of GeoGebra software on pre-service mathematics teachers’ attitudes and views toward proof and proving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(7), 1002–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1298855
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rafiq Badjeber, Nursupiamin, Sandi Tri Subekhi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
