Students' Decision-Making in Solving Mathematical Word Problems Based on Adversity Quotient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v8i1.2751Keywords:
Abstract
This study aims to describe students’ decision-making processes in solving mathematical word problems based on their Adversity Quotient (AQ). A qualitative research method was employed. Data were collected through AQ questionnaires, decision-making tests, and interviews. The data analysis techniques included data reduction, data presentation, verification, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed the presence of 2 climber-type students, 5 students transitioning from camper to climber, 16 camper-type students, and 4 students transitioning from quitter to camper; no students were identified as quitters. The results show that climber-type rational students fulfilled all indicators of decision-making. Rational students transitioning from camper to climber fulfilled all indicators except for recalling the relationship between the problem, known information, and the decision made. Heuristic students in this category were unable to present or recall that relationship. Camper-type students with intuitive and rational decision-making styles were able to identify problems and goals, find alternative solutions, solve the problems, evaluate the alternatives, and make decisions. Students transitioning from camper to quitter with an intuitive style could identify problems, find alternative solutions, solve the problems, and make decisions. Meanwhile, those with a rational style could only find alternative solutions, solve the problems, and make decisions.
Downloads
References
Aini, N. N., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada soal cerita matematika berdasarkan teori Polya ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2020.v2i1.105-128
Almubarokah, N., Theis, R., & Iriani, D. (2024). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) pada materi aritmatika sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v14i1.1501
Astiantari, I., Pambudi, D. S., Oktavianingtyas, E., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1270. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.5073
Ayuningrum, D. (2017). Strategi pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP ditinjau dari tingkat berpikir geometri Van Hiele. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i1.6851
Chabibah, L. N., Siswanah, E., & Tsani, D. F. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024
Darmadi, D. (2019). Nilai dan karakter dalam pembelajaran matematika. Prosiding Silogisme, 14–21. http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/PSNPM/article/viewFile/604/575
Darojat, L., & Kartono. (2016). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal open ended berdasarkan AQ dengan learning cycle 7E. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 5(1), 1–8. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Eta, G., & Ariyanti, G. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari adversity quotient pada siswa SMPN 1 Madiun. Jurnal Ilmiah Edukasi Matematika (JIEM), 9(2), 1–18.
Hanik, H., Anwar, L., & Kusumasari, V. (2023). Pengambilan keputusan siswa sekolah menengah dalam menyelesaikan masalah numerasi berdasarkan gender. 12(1), 589–599.
Hidayah, N. N., & Setianingsih, R. (2024). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah kontekstual materi statistika ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Mathedunesa, 13(1), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v13n1.p132-144
Hidayat, W., & Saringnih, R. (2018). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan adversity quotient siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran open ended. Tubercle and Lung Disease, 2(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8479(96)90008-8
Mahareni, D. M., & Wijayanti, P. (2018). Profil siswa SMP dalam memecahkan soal TIMSS ditinjau dari tingkat adversity quotient. 7(3), 663–668.
Mawardhiyah, K., & Manoy, J. T. (2018). Literasi matematika siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) berdasarkan adversity quotient (AQ). MATHEdunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 638–643.
Mena, A. B. (2016). Literasi matematis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah kontekstual ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i2.6756
Nafi’an, M. I. (2021). Penyelesaian soal cerita siswa sekolah dasar berdasarkan gender. ABSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 3(2), 328–336.
Novianawati, N., & Nahadi. (2015). Analysis of students’ decision making to solve science reasoning test of Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3491
Pribadi, M. H. P., Lestari, N. D. S., Oktavianingtyas, E., Kurniati, D., & Monalisa, L. A. (2023). Literasi matematis siswa SMA dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2530–2542. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2232
Putra, R. P., Madawistama, S. T., & Heryani, Y. (2022). Kemampuan argumentasi matematis ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal Kongruen, 1(2), 175–181. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/kongruen
Putri, N. M., Sumaji, S., & Purwaningrum, J. P. (2023). Profil kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v8i2.3134
Rahma, N. N., & Rahaju, E. B. (2020). Proses berpikir siswa SMA dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Mathedunesa, 9(2), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n2.p329-338
Rahmawati, R. (2020). Analisis adversity quotient mahasiswa PGMI dalam mengatasi masalah. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v9i2.3122
Rosikhoh, D., Firdiansyah, A. L., & Hasanah, R. (2023). Investigasi pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan kategori Adversity Quotient pada siswa kelas XII. Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.37905/jmathedu.v4i2.20302
Septianingtyas, N., & Jusra, H. (2020). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik berdasarkan adversity quotient. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.263
Setyaningrum, D. R., & Widiyastuti, E. (2020). Profil kemampuan pengambilan keputusan dalam pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMK ditinjau dari gaya berpikir. Pendidikan Matematika UM Purwokerto, (2014), 0–7.
Silvatama, M. A., Yustika, U. N., Nuriah, D., & Wahyuni, I. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berpikir lateral siswa berdasarkan adversity quotient (AQ) dalam pemecahan masalah geometri. Indonesian Journal of Science, Technology and Humanities, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.60076/ijstech.v1i1.7
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity quotient: Mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang. Grasindo.
Sugiarti, T., Suwito, A., Ummah, F. R. (2022). Representasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan PISA konten space and shape ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Pythagoras: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 17(2), 425-434. https://doi.org/10.21831/pythagoras.v17i2.47686
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sumartini, T. S. (2016). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Garut, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v7i2.3555
Wahab, M., Mirza, A., & Hamdani, H. (2022). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada materi perbandingan ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal AlphaEuclidEdu, 3(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.26418/ja.v3i2.60888
Wang, Y., & Ruhe, G. (2007). The cognitive process of decision making. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, 1(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2007040105
Warapsari, L. F. (2015). Adversity quotient pada mahasiswa berprestasi. https://eprints.ums.ac.id/id/eprint/36474
Widiyawati, Y., Nurwahidah, I., & Sari, D. S. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen Integrated Science Test tipe pilihan ganda beralasan untuk mengukur HOTS peserta didik. Saintifika, 21(2), 1–14.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1317
Wulandari, I. P. (2019). Berpikir kritis matematis dan kepercayaan diri siswa ditinjau dari adversity quotient. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 176. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/29211/12879
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ellita Destriani Savitri, Ike Natalliasari, Redi Hermanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
