A Qualitative analysis of teacher feedback and student motivation in statistics didactic design

Authors

  • Tina Yunarti Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Annisa Mutiarani Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Santy Setiawati Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
  • Niki Pujarwati SMPN 26 Bandar Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v9i1.3347

Keywords:

student motivation, statistics learning, didactic design, qualitative case study, teacher feedback, motivasi berlajar, desain didaktik, umpan balik guru

Abstract

Teacher feedback plays an important role in supporting students’ learning motivation, particularly when it is integrated into the learning process through a well-structured didactic design. However, feedback in statistics learning is often still predominantly evaluative and has not been systematically used to guide students’ learning processes. This study aims to identify the types of teacher feedback provided to students in Class VII-A of SMP Negeri 26 Bandar Lampung and to describe students’ learning motivation after receiving feedback within a statistics didactic design. This research employed a qualitative case study design involving 31 seventh-grade students in the even semester of the 2023/2024 academic year. Data were collected through field notes, Likert-scale questionnaires on teacher feedback and student learning motivation, and interviews. The data were analyzed descriptively to identify patterns of teacher feedback and students’ motivational responses. The findings indicate that verbal feedback was the dominant form of feedback provided by the teacher. The most frequently observed feedback indicators were timely, specific, and process-focused feedback. In addition, students with high and moderate mathematical ability tended to show higher learning motivation than students with low mathematical ability. These findings suggest that process-oriented teacher feedback can support students’ motivation in learning statistics, especially when it is embedded in a structured didactic design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Said, K. (2023). Influence of teacher on student motivation: Opportunities to increase motivational factors during mobile learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 13439–13457.

Amry, Z., & Syahputra, H. (2020). Contribution of mathematical anxiety, learning motivation, and self-confidence to students’ mathematical problem solving. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal, 3(4), 1759–1772. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i4.1343

Anwar, M. N., Khizar, A., & Kahungu, M. K. (2025). Empowering mathematics learning: Feedback orientation as a mediator in feedback, achievement motivation, and achievement. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27684830.2025.2578874

Aprilia, P. (2024). Cara penanganan siswa berkemampuan di atas rata-rata, sedang, dan rendah. Journal of Knowledge and Collaboration, 1(7), 311–323.

Arthur, Y. D., Simon, C., Dogbe, K., & Asiedu-Addo, S. K. (2022). Enhancing performance in mathematics through motivation, peer-assisted learning, and teaching quality: The mediating role of student interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(2).

Aslam, R., Khan, N., & Joseph, V. (2021). Impact of learning motivation on students’ academic achievement: Mediating role of constructive feedback. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(3), 472–484.

Assey, E. S., & Babyegeya, E. (2022). The challenges facing effective teaching, learning and assessment in community-based secondary schools in Tabora Region. American Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 1–17.

Avcı, S. (2022). Investigation of the individual characteristics that predict academic resilience. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(3), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1076091

Ben-Zvi, D., Gravemeijer, K., & Ainley, J. (2019). Design of statistics learning environments. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11). Utrecht University.

Boadu, S. K. (2024). Enhancing students’ achievement in mathematics education in the 21st century through technology integration, collaborative learning, and student motivation: The mediating role of student interest. [Journal name needed], 20(11).

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Erlia, W. (2021). Roles of the teacher for increasing learning quality of students. ETUDE: Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 77–86.

Fitriani, N., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2024). Didactical design of learning mathematics in reducing students’ learning obstacles. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2622(1).

Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021). Teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation, and feedback behavior: How are they associated with learning outcomes? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 697045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045

Haroon, A., & Kausar, F. N. (2025). Influence of curiosity on students’ lifelong learning orientation and cognitive engagement in higher education. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(4), 86–102.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320096

Kutasi, R. (2023). Feedback: Unveiling its impact and enhancing its effectiveness in education. Journal of Pedagogy, 2, 7–32.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Mahara, A. D., & Hartono, D. (2024). The effect of corrective feedback to improve students’ motivation in speaking skills: A perspective from EFL learners. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(4), 42–53.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Muhammadiah, M., Hamsiah, A., Muzakki, A., & Fauzi, Z. A. (2022). The role of the professional teacher as the agent of change for students. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6887–6896. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.1372

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Roche, A., Gervasoni, A., & Kalogeropoulos, P. (2021). [Article title needs verification: mathematics for low-achieving primary students across three learning settings]. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00402-w

Sachdeva, S. (2021). Learners’ critical thinking about learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3).

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Sardiman. (2016). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. PT Raja Grafindo.

Schwab, S., Markus, S., & Hassani, S. (2024). Teachers’ feedback in the context of students’ social acceptance, students’ well-being in school, and students’ emotions. Educational Studies, 50(5), 978–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.2023475

Sutter, C. C., Givvin, K. B., & Hulleman, C. S. (2024). Concerns and challenges in introductory statistics and correlates with motivation and interest. The Journal of Experimental Education, 92(4), 662–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2023.2229777

Tambunan, H. (2021). Analysis of teacher performance to build student interest and motivation towards mathematics achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20711

Triwiratman, A., Nusantara, T., & Hitipeuw, I. (2023). Level of learning independence in elementary school students: The influence of self-efficacy, motivation, and peer interaction. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(4), 705–718.

Wang, X. (2025). Exploring the effect of teacher feedback on students’ self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Vocational Education, 7(4), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.53469/jrve.2025.07(04).03

Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2021). Who is feedback for? The influence of accountability and quality assurance agendas on the enactment of feedback processes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(3), 261–278.

Wong, Z. Y., Liem, G. A. D., Chan, M., & Datu, J. A. D. (2021). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(1), 48.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Zahid, M. U. (2025). The role of effective feedback in enhancing student academic achievement through virtual formative assessment: A comprehensive study. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 14(1), 1854–1878. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/24941

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

How to Cite

Yunarti, T., Mutiarani, A., Setiawati, S., & Pujarwati, N. (2026). A Qualitative analysis of teacher feedback and student motivation in statistics didactic design. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v9i1.3347

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.